Search for: "Hopkins v. Strong"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Case Report: Monroe v Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimant’s evidence and defendant’s closing submissions
28 Feb 2017, 4:16 pm
The trial of the case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins (see our case preview from last Friday) began on Monday 27 February 2017 before Mr Justice Warby in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Nonetheless, the Tribunal accepted the strong public interest in there being a safe space for policy formulation. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
• The Court rejected Ms Hopkins’ argument that the tweets did not cause serious harm on the basis that they were only published to readers who would already have strong views on the Claimant either way. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
Robin Hopkins is a barrister at 11KBW. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The “Twitter Libel” case of Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins continued to take the media law headlines this week. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Relying on R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, the majority noted that there is a strong interpretative presumption against the exclusion of judicial review, other than by “the most clear and explicit words” (Laws LJ in Cart at the Court of Appeal). [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
Before the Supreme Court term commences next week, Cathryn Hopkins and Ryan Dolby-Stevens take the opportunity to look back at some of the key judgments that the Court handed down in 2015 in the areas of contract law, public law, tort and fraud, and highlight the points for commercial law practitioners to be aware of. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 3:34 am
My dad was a public health economist here at Hopkins and my dad’s second wife, Mary Klarman, was an epidemiologist in the school of public health. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
Furthermore, the Court observed that there were strong public policy and practical reasons for addressing the issue of invalidity regardless of the outcome of the question of infringement. 508 U.S. at 102-01. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 4:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 12:48 pm
The Facts of the Case In the case of Rayner v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:18 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 8:18 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:10 am
So too it can be said about the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 3:43 am
Since his appointment he has given judgment in a wide range of important defamation, privacy and data protection cases including, for example: Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) Lachaux v Independent Print [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) Monroe v Hopkins [2017] EWHC 433 (QB) Hourani v Thomson [2017] EWHC 432 (QB) NT1 and NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) Lloyd… [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:50 am
Affirming its earlier decisions in Hopkins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In this case, Young v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 5:44 pm
Gross v. [read post]
